How 100+ UK insurance brokerages show up across Trustpilot, Feefo, LinkedIn, the FCA Register and Companies House. Editorial commentary on publicly available data.
At Foliume we wanted to answer a simple question: what does the internet actually say about UK insurance brokers?
We looked at 100+ brokerages across Google, Feefo, Trustpilot, the FCA Register and Companies House. Not what they say about themselves, but what the public record shows. No surveys, no paid placements.
What we found is that brokers of all sizes are building their online presence in different ways. Some lead on LinkedIn, others on Google reviews, others through industry credentials. Every firm has a story, and the data tells it clearly.
This report is for the people running broking businesses who want to see how they show up online, and where the best opportunities are to stand out.
I hope it gives you something useful, and a few surprises along the way.
We went looking for how UK brokers show up online. The gap between the best and the rest was bigger than we expected.
Of the 114 mostly-large, mostly-national brokers in our sample, only 14 have a verified Google rating. The rest are trading on reputation built entirely offline. Small high-street brokers outside this sample often rank well on Google Maps — this finding is about the top of the market, where the online reputation gap is widest. Full sample criteria below.
Only 4 of the 22 largest UK brokers we tracked have enough verified reviews across Google, Feefo and Trustpilot to register a Client Voice score. The other 18 — including Aon, WTW, Marsh and Lockton — lead on credentials and scale, but are effectively silent where clients look first.
69% of brokers we tracked have fewer than 5,000 LinkedIn followers. Alan Boswell Group, a 400-person Norwich broker, scores higher on our index than Aon or WTW. In online voice, size is not destiny.
Client Voice and Digital Presence together make up 55% of the score because this report is about how brokers show up online. Credentials, scale and longevity give context. A broker needs at least three of the five dimensions to qualify, which is why 64 of 100+ brokers are ranked.
Our sample is 114 brokers: 22 enterprise, 27 mid-market, 65 small. This is not a random draw of all UK brokers — the FCA Register has thousands of authorised firms. We curated the list around the most visible end of the market: the largest national and regional brokers, the best-known mid-market consolidators, and the leading digital-first small brokers. Selection criteria, in order: (1) appears in BIBA member directory, Insurance Times Top 50, or IIB listings; (2) >50 staff or national/multi-office footprint; or (3) recognised digital-first player (Simply Business, Policy Expert, PolicyBee, Cuvva, Konsileo). Small local high-street brokers that rely on Google Maps for acquisition are under-represented by design — every finding in this report refers to this sample, not the UK broker market as a whole.
Every input is pulled from Companies House, the FCA Register, Google Maps, Feefo, Trustpilot or the brokers' own websites. The scores are computed, not guessed. Any broker can replicate the calculation from the sources we cite on each profile.
The Online Voice Score measures online visibility and public reputation signals within our curated sample. Every broker in the UK does valuable work for their clients. This score captures one angle of that picture: the public-facing one, for the top of the market. It's a starting point for understanding how your firm shows up, not a final judgement.
Want to see where your broker ranks?
Search 100+ brokers1,000+ employees or global reach. Enterprise brokers lead on LinkedIn presence, industry credentials and scale. Their reputation is built through institutional relationships and professional networks.
| # | Broker | City | Since | Staff | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gallagher UK | London | 1988 | 5,200+ | 71.0 |
| 2 | Howden Group | London | 1994 | 18,000+ | 63.4 |
| 3 | Ardonagh Group | London | 2021 | 12,000+ | 56.1 |
| 4 | Everywhen | London | 2010 | 2,000+ | 56.1 |
| 5 | Tysers | London | 1994 | 1,040+ | 41.8 |
100 to 999 staff or fast-scaling digital players. The firms investing most actively in their online presence right now.
| # | Broker | City | Since | Staff | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Alan Boswell Group | Norwich | 1989 | 400 | 81.8 |
| 2 | Kingsbridge | Tewkesbury | 2000 | — | 57.0 |
| 3 | Policy Expert | London | 2010 | — | 54.4 |
| 4 | Zego | London | 2016 | — | 53.6 |
| 5 | HomeLet | Lincoln | — | ~300 | 53.4 |
Under 100 staff. Regional, specialist, often family-run. Where client voice can be loudest relative to size.
| # | Broker | City | Since | Staff | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SJL Insurance Services | Worcester | 2001 | — | 57.6 |
| 2 | PolicyBee | Norwich | 2010 | — | 56.3 |
| 3 | Norton Insurance Brokers | Birmingham | 1965 | — | 53.9 |
| 4 | Wrightsure Group | Orsett | 1975 | — | 52.3 |
| 5 | Connect Insurance Brokers | Stoke-on-Trent | 1989 | — | 50.7 |
Enterprise brokers typically lead on LinkedIn and credentials. Their client relationships tend to live in direct conversations rather than public review platforms.
The five mid-market brokers with the strongest online pulse.
The five smaller or independent brokers with the strongest online pulse. Where client voice is loudest relative to size.
Single-metric rankings that show a different side of the market. Each one tells a different story than the headline index.
The counter-intuitive ranking. Client Voice dimension only — reviews weighted by volume across Google, Feefo and Trustpilot. Size, credentials and longevity stripped out. The league table clients would build if the only thing that counted was what other clients say. No Big Three broker makes the top 8.
Why this matters: Aon, WTW and Marsh don't have enough public reviews to score on this dimension at all. Only four enterprise brokers qualify — Gallagher (68.3), Howden (69.8), Ardonagh (70.5), Everywhen (70.5) — and their average is 69.8. Regional mid-market and small brokers are running rings around them on the one metric clients can verify themselves.
Ranked by Google rating weighted by review volume. You need both a strong score and enough reviews to make it count.
Online Voice Score adjusted for headcount. These brokers outperform what you'd expect for their size.
Founded since 2010, with real traction showing up in headcount, customers or public reviews. The ones worth watching.
You already sense these if you're in the market. Here they are, named and backed by the receipts.
Howden bought Aston Lark and A-Plan. Ardonagh built a £2bn GWP platform on top of Towergate. PIB Group, backed by Apax, is now in 11 markets. Gallagher took Stackhouse Poland and Bollington. Private equity isn't slowing down, and the mid-market is where the deals land.
Simply Business is serving close to a million customers online. Policy Expert passed 1.6 million. PolicyBee invented quote-and-buy in the UK. Konsileo's self-managed model runs 206 brokers without a traditional office. This isn't a fringe channel anymore, it's the market.
Since July 2023, the FCA's Consumer Duty has forced every broker to evidence fair value and good client outcomes. The interesting question isn't whether firms are compliant on paper. It's whether that evidence is visible where clients and regulators actually look: the firm's own website, Google, Feefo, Trustpilot. A thin public reputation signal is now a risk signal too. The brokers treating Consumer Duty as a story to tell — in reviews, case studies, visible complaint handling — are the ones turning a compliance obligation into a retention lever. The rest are leaving the narrative to whoever leaves a one-star review first.
Search any of the 100+ brokers we track. See their Online Voice Score, their dimension breakdown, and how they compare. If you want the full profile with peer benchmarks and recommendations, we'll send it across.
Not on the list? Tell us who to add next
We take accuracy seriously. If we have something wrong, tell us and we will fix it.
Editorial commentary based on public data. The Online Voice Score measures how brokers show up across Google, Feefo, Trustpilot, the FCA Register and Companies House. It is not financial advice and not a recommendation to engage or avoid any broker. Foliume is not authorised or regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority.
Every data point is pulled from one of: Companies House, the FCA Register, broker websites, Feefo, Trustpilot and Google Maps. Google ratings came from a mix of the Google Places API and third-party aggregators that surface Google Maps data. Each broker profile lists the sources we used. Data collected April 2026.
If you spot a mistake or your firm has moved, renamed or changed status, email hola@foliume.com. We respond within five working days and publish updates in the next edition. The search tool above also lets you request a full profile if you think we missed you.
The form in this report collects your name, work email and the broker you asked about. We use it to send you the full profile and related Foliume updates, nothing else. You can unsubscribe at any time and request deletion by emailing hola@foliume.com. Full privacy notice at foliume.com/privacy-policy.
© Foliume 2026 • hola@foliume.com